{"id":3484,"date":"2010-08-03T10:47:15","date_gmt":"2010-08-03T14:47:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.jasetaro.com\/blog\/?p=3484"},"modified":"2010-09-16T21:38:31","modified_gmt":"2010-09-17T01:38:31","slug":"pete-stark-the-federal-government-can-do-most-anything-in-this-country","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.jasetaro.com\/blog\/2010\/08\/03\/pete-stark-the-federal-government-can-do-most-anything-in-this-country\/","title":{"rendered":"Pete Stark: The Federal Government can do most anything in this country"},"content":{"rendered":"

This video of Congressman Pete Stark (D-CA) has been making the rounds… it’s extraordinary, the woman questioning Rep. Stark lays out one the clearest examples of the Constitutional issues surrounding health care reform I’ve seen and Rep. Stark simply has no answer for them saying:<\/p>\n

I think that there are very few constitutional limits that would prevent the federal government from rules that could affect your private life. Now, the basis for that would be, how does it affect other people. In other words… The federal government, yes, can do most anything in this country.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

<\/object><\/p>\n

His answer is rather chilling, but it seems to reflect the broader attitude of many in Congress… Screw the Constitution we can do whatever we want and you rubes had better get used to it.<\/p>\n

Every member of Congress swears an oath to defend the Constitution of United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic:<\/p>\n

\u201cI, [State your Name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Frankly, I don’t see how Rep. Stark can bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution when he so clearly has no respect for it or the limits it places on the powers of the Federal Government. Ronald Reagan said it best, The federal government has taken too much tax money from the people, too much authority from the states, and too much liberty with the Constitution.<\/p>\n

I should note that while the woman questioning Rep. Stark argues very effectively against health care reform on 13th Amendment grounds, as Ed Morrissey notes<\/a>, Fifth Amendment protections against the confiscation of private property and the Article I, Section 8 mandate that Congress protect ownership ones \u201cexclusive right to their Writings and Discoveries\u201d for those in the sciences and arts also apply.<\/p>\n

Update<\/strong><\/span> (Wednesday, August 4, 2010): Michelle Malkin has more<\/a> on Pete Stark’s remarks at last weekend\u2019s town hall… Rep. Stark apparently didn’t know what the Government’s E-Verify program is and mockingly told his constituents that denying jobs to illegal aliens could be \u201cunconstitutional.\u201d<\/p>\n

Wow, Pete Stark is another great example of why we need Congressional Term limits. Never mind his convoluted views on the Constitution, he’s openly contemptuous of the people he was elected to represent. Rep. Stark seems to have forgotten that he is an elected representative who serves at the will of the people, it’s time for the people of California’s 13th congressional district to send him into retirement.<\/p>\n

Related<\/strong><\/p>\n