{"id":3235,"date":"2010-02-25T12:29:06","date_gmt":"2010-02-25T17:29:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.jasetaro.com\/blog\/?p=3235"},"modified":"2010-02-25T22:20:03","modified_gmt":"2010-02-26T03:20:03","slug":"obama-administration-to-britain-drop-dead","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.jasetaro.com\/blog\/2010\/02\/25\/obama-administration-to-britain-drop-dead\/","title":{"rendered":"Obama Administration to Britain: Drop Dead"},"content":{"rendered":"

I’ll say this much for the Obama Administration: They’re consistent. From the get go they’ve made it clear that longstanding American allies can expected to be taken for granted, insulted and, if convenient, dumped in favor of appeasement. Consequently this administrations decision to not support Britain, our closest ally, in its latest dispute with Argentina over the Falkland Islands shouldn’t come as surprise to anyone…<\/p>\n

From the London Times<\/a>:<\/p>\n

Washington refused to endorse British claims to sovereignty over the Falkland Islands yesterday as the diplomatic row over oil drilling in the South Atlantic intensified in London, Buenos Aires and at the UN.<\/p>\n

Despite Britain\u2019s close alliance with the US, the Obama Administration is determined not to be drawn into the issue. It has also declined to back Britain\u2019s claim that oil exploration near the islands is sanctioned by international law, saying that the dispute is strictly a bilateral issue…<\/p>\n

~ ~ ~<\/strong><\/p>\n

Senior US officials insisted that Washington\u2019s position on the Falklands was one of longstanding neutrality. This is in stark contrast to the public backing and vital intelligence offered by President Reagan to Margaret Thatcher once she had made the decision to recover the islands by force in 1982.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe are aware not only of the current situation but also of the history, but our position remains one of neutrality,\u201d a State Department spokesman told The Times. \u201cThe US recognises de facto UK administration of the islands but takes no position on the sovereignty claims of either party.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

This administrations actions are sad and shameful thing particularly when you contrast them with in unconditional support President Ronald Reagan offered to Margaret Thatcher in 1982 or that Prime Minister Tony Blair provided George W. Bush in the War on Terror. As Toby Young notes in the Daily Telegraph<\/a>:<\/p>\n

For this alliance to survive, both countries must recognise their obligations and, from time to time, that involves one of us setting aside more localised concerns for the sake of the cause. Tony Blair would have preferred it if President Bush had been prepared to wait for a second UN resolution before launching the invasion of Iraq, but he decided that Britain should follow America into battle nevertheless. He recognised that the preservation of the Atlantic alliance had to be prioritised above all else, both for our sake\u00a0and the sake of the world.<\/p>\n

In return, we naturally expect America to side with us when it comes to our own territorial disputes \u2014 and this element of quid pro quo was recognised by Ronald Reagan when he backed Margaret Thatcher in the Falklands War. It wasn\u2019t in America\u2019s regional interests to side with us, but Reagan knew the terms of the deal: It was your country, right or wrong. You don\u2019t abandon your closest ally in her hour of need.<\/p>\n

So it is truly shocking that Barack Obama has decided to disregard our shared history and insist that we have to fight this battle on our own. Does Britain\u2019s friendship really mean so little to him? Do the sacrifices Britain has made in defence of the Atlantic alliance count for nought? Who does he think will replace us as America\u2019s steadfast ally when she finds herself embroiled in a territorial dispute of her own \u2014 possibly with the very same motley crew of Latin American rabble rousers? Spain? Italy? France? Good luck with that, Mr President.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Shame on you , Mr. President, shame. This Administration, in the name of neutrality, has chosen to side with the\u00a0 aggressive, corrupt Argentine government of Christina Fernandez de Kirchner… A government that is being supported and encouraged by Hugo Chavez<\/a> and that is threatening to blockade British territory<\/a>.<\/p>\n

We can not let this outrage stand. Call the White House, call your Senators, call your Representatives and tell them that We The People<\/em> will not allow this administration to throw away the United State\u2019s longstanding special relationship with our closest ally.<\/p>\n

Related<\/strong><\/p>\n