<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jeffrey A. Setaro&#187; Unemployment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/tag/unemployment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jasetaro.com/blog</link>
	<description>Political &#38; Cultural Commentary from a Constitutional Conservative.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:57:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Jobless Rate Falls to 8.9% as 192K Jobs Added</title>
		<link>http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2011/03/04/jobless-rate-falls-to-8-9-as-192k-jobs-added/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2011/03/04/jobless-rate-falls-to-8-9-as-192k-jobs-added/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/?p=3819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today&#8217;s jobless report is a good news bad news thing, first the good news&#8230; From Bloomberg: U.S. employers added 192,000 workers in February, amid an improving economy and more seasonable weather, and the unemployment rate unexpectedly declined to 8.9 percent, the lowest level since April 2009. So what&#8217;s the bad news? In short the primary [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today&#8217;s jobless report is a good news bad news thing, first the good news&#8230; From <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-03-04/u-s-payrolls-climbed-192-000-in-february-as-jobless-rate-declined-to-8-9-.html" target="_blank">Bloomberg</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>U.S. employers added 192,000 workers in February, amid an improving economy and more seasonable weather, and the unemployment rate unexpectedly declined to 8.9 percent, the lowest level since April 2009.</p></blockquote>
<p>So what&#8217;s the bad news? In short the primary reason unemployment is falling is that labor force participation rate is at a 27 year low. We have to go all the way back to March 1984 to find a participation rate this low. As Ed Morrissey <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2011/03/04/jobless-rate-edges-down-to-8-9-192k-jobs-added/" target="_blank">notes</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The lower denominator makes the overall jobless rate look better than it  should.  If we were at the same participation rate as we saw in  mid-2008, we would probably add two or three points to the unemployment  rate.  And at some time, those workers will re-enter the job-seeking  population and the rate will rise accordingly.</p></blockquote>
<p>So while the media is trumpeting the good news about the falling unemployment rate you might want to ask yourself why there&#8217;s no mention of the shrinking workforce or the gross disparity between the Department of Labor report and private-sector surveys such as <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/146453/Gallup-Finds-Unemployment-Hitting-February.aspx" target="_blank">Gallup</a>. Which shows unemployment at 10.3% and underemployment at 19.9%.</p>
<p>The short answer is that the DoL has been steadily shrinking the work force by eliminating those who  fall off unemployment rolls without finding a job or who failed to check-in with a state employment office in the past month.  This  little bit of statistical voodoo grossly understates the level of real unemployment. It&#8217;s easy for the Bureau of Labor Statistics to pretty up the numbers when they&#8217;ve chopped 500,000 from the workforce in their latest revision.</p>
<p><strong>Related</strong><a rel="bookmark" href="http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/15976"></a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/15976" target="_blank">True Unemployment Still Over 10%</a> &#8211; AJ Srata, The Strata-Sphere</li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/james-pethokoukis/2011/03/04/the-new-underclass-and-barack-obama/" target="_blank">The new underclass and Barack Obama</a> &#8211; James Pethokoukis, Reuters</li>
<li><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/03/03/utah-considers-return-gold-silver-coins/" target="_blank">Utah Considers Return to Gold, Silver Coins</a> &#8211; Fox News</li>
<li><a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2011/03/democrats_keep_misleading_on_c.html" target="_blank">Democrats keep misleading on claimed budget &#8216;cuts&#8217;</a> &#8211; Glenn Kessler, The Washington Post</li>
<li><a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/41911006" target="_blank">&#8216;Good&#8217; Jobs Report Has Dark Side</a> &#8211; Rick Santelli, CNBC<a rel="bookmark" href="http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/15976"><br />
</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2011/03/04/jobless-rate-falls-to-8-9-as-192k-jobs-added/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video: The Truth About Our Jobs Crisis</title>
		<link>http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2010/10/15/video-the-truth-about-our-jobs-crisis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2010/10/15/video-the-truth-about-our-jobs-crisis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 17:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/?p=3596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The folks over at Bankrupting America have produced a video and infographic that really puts our  current jobs crisis in perspective: I really can&#8217;t add anything here other than pointing you to a rather chilling analysis from Investor&#8217;s Business Daily: U.S. Won’t Recover Lost Jobs Until March 2020 At Current Pace. This election is probably [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The folks over at Bankrupting America have produced a <a href="http://www.bankruptingamerica.org/2010/10/13/infographic-the-truth-about-our-jobs-crisis/" target="_blank">video and infographic</a> that really puts our  current jobs crisis in perspective:<br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="495" height="303" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jjI3Ntw324E?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="495" height="303" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/jjI3Ntw324E?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>I really can&#8217;t add anything here other than pointing you to a rather chilling analysis from Investor&#8217;s Business Daily: <a href="http://blogs.investors.com/capitalhill/index.php/home/35-politicsinvesting/2128-us-wont-recover-lost-jobs-until-march-2020-at-current-pace" target="_blank">U.S. Won’t Recover Lost Jobs Until March 2020 At Current Pace</a>.</p>
<p>This election is probably one of the most critical in history, if can&#8217;t break the Democrats hold on Congress we&#8217;re doomed to years of high unemployment, limited economic growth and diminished liberty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2010/10/15/video-the-truth-about-our-jobs-crisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Economy Loses 95,000 Jobs in September, Unemployment Remains at 9.6%</title>
		<link>http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2010/10/08/u-s-economy-loses-95000-jobs-in-september-unemployment-remains-at-9-6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2010/10/08/u-s-economy-loses-95000-jobs-in-september-unemployment-remains-at-9-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 14:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/?p=3580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stagnation&#8230; That&#8217;s really the only way to describe today&#8217;s jobs report. The U.S. economy shed 95,000 more jobs last month and the number of  underemployed grew by 612,000, and now stands at 9.5 million people: WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — The U.S. economy lost 95,000 nonfarm jobs in September as local and state governments shed positions at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stagnation&#8230; That&#8217;s really the only way to describe today&#8217;s jobs report. The U.S. economy <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-economy-sheds-95000-jobs-in-sept-2010-10-08?dist=beforebell" target="_blank">shed</a> 95,000 more jobs last month and the number of  underemployed <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm" target="_blank">grew by 612,000</a>, and now stands at 9.5  million people:</p>
<blockquote><p>WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — The U.S. economy lost 95,000 nonfarm jobs in  September as local and state governments shed positions at a faster rate  than the private sector was adding, the Labor Department reported  Friday.</p>
<p>The drop of 95,000 was much wider than the 8,000 decline expected by  economists surveyed by MarketWatch, and the 57,000 jobs lost in August.</p>
<p>The nation’s unemployment rate remained steady at 9.6% as fewer new  workers joined the labor market than in the previous month. Economists  had expected a slight increase in the jobless rate.</p></blockquote>
<p>Unemployment has now been above 9.5% for 14 straight months, as the Associated Press <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_economy;_ylt=AhLsqxqlCiqTHmmoIysgyXGs0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTJiZ2doaWprBGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMTAxMDA4L3VzX2Vjb25vbXkEY3BvcwMyBHBvcwM3BHNlYwN5bl90b3Bfc3RvcnkEc2xrA2Vjb25vbXlsb3Nlcw--" target="_blank">notes</a> that&#8217;s the longest since the 1930s.</p>
<p>As a practical matter, with the mid-term elections just a month, this isn&#8217;t good news incumbent Democrats seeking re-election. They&#8217;re controlled Congress and the nation&#8217;s purse strings since January 2007 and what do have to show for it? I mean other than 14 months of 9.5% plus unemployment and a stagnant economy?</p>
<p><strong>Related</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/143426/Gallup-Finds-Unemployment-September.aspx" target="_blank">Gallup Finds  U.S. Unemployment at 10.1% in September</a> &#8211; Gallup</li>
<li><a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/will_election_workers_skew_friday_MEqqwiA9I8tG6tNF5w42AP" target="_blank">Will election workers skew Friday job stats?</a> &#8211; New York Post</li>
<li><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6955IX20101007" target="_blank">Job losses in 2009 likely bigger than thought</a> &#8211; Reuters</li>
<li><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704696304575538334028041428.html" target="_blank">Dollar&#8217;s Fall Roils World</a> &#8211; Wall Street Journal (Subscription Required)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-10-08/greenspan-says-u-s-engaged-in-dangerous-game-as-debt-deficits-increase.html" target="_blank">Greenspan Says U.S. Creating `Scary&#8217; Deficit By Borrowing</a> &#8211; Bloomberg</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2010/10/08/u-s-economy-loses-95000-jobs-in-september-unemployment-remains-at-9-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNBC: Economy Caught in Depression, Not Recession</title>
		<link>http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2010/08/25/cnbc-economy-caught-in-depression-not-recession/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2010/08/25/cnbc-economy-caught-in-depression-not-recession/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Confidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Rosenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duraable Goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/?p=3518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I be the first one to admit I&#8217;m a pessimist on the economy, but not even I&#8217;m this pessimistic: Positive gross domestic product readings and other mildly hopeful signs are masking an ugly truth: The US economy is in a 1930s-style Depression, Gluskin Sheff economist David Rosenberg said Tuesday. Writing in his daily briefing to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I be the first one to admit I&#8217;m a pessimist on the economy, but not even I&#8217;m <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/38831550" target="_blank">this</a> pessimistic:</p>
<blockquote><p>Positive gross domestic product readings and  other mildly hopeful signs are masking an ugly truth: The US economy is  in a 1930s-style Depression, Gluskin Sheff economist David Rosenberg  said Tuesday.</p>
<p>Writing  in his daily briefing to investors, Rosenberg said the Great Depression  also had its high points, with a series of positive GDP reports and  sharp stock market gains.</p>
<p>But then as now, those signs of recovery were unsustainable and only provided a false sense of stability, said Rosenberg.</p>
<p>Rosenberg calls <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/20910258/?site=20910258">current economic conditions</a><strong><strong> </strong></strong>&#8220;a  depression, and not just some garden-variety recession,&#8221; and notes that  any good news both during the initial 1929-33 recession and the one  that began in 2008 triggered &#8220;euphoric response.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Such  is human nature and nobody can be blamed for trying to be optimistic;  however, in the money management business, we have a fiduciary  responsibility to be as realistic as possible about the outlook for the  economy and the market at all times,&#8221; he said.</p></blockquote>
<p>Mr. Rosenberg&#8217;s argument it compelling, I&#8217;m not sure agree with him, but like I said I&#8217;m a pessimist on the economy. I&#8217;ve thought all along this so called recovery was more akin to a dead cat bounce than an actual meaningful sustained recovery&#8230; And that&#8217;s what the data seems to indicate. All the indicators I&#8217;m looking at, <a href="http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/14010" target="_blank">employment</a>, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703447004575449352676306326.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection" target="_blank">housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-08-25/durable-goods-orders-rise-less-than-forecast-in-u-s-as-investment-cools.html" target="_blank">durable goods</a>, and <a href="http://www.conference-board.org/data/consumerconfidence.cfm" target="_blank">consumer confidence</a> are pointing to anything but a recovery. Are we actually in a depression? I don&#8217;t know, but I think it&#8217;s safe to say this isn&#8217;t a garden variety recession.</p>
<p><strong>Related</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/marketbeat/2010/08/23/yes-folks-hindenburg-omen-tripped-again/" target="_blank">Yes Folks, Hindenburg Omen Tripped Again</a> &#8211; Wall Street Journal</li>
<li><a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/85b58588-af4e-11df-a172-00144feabdc0.html" target="_blank">Asian markets continue retreat from risk</a> &#8211; Financial Times</li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/columns/2010/08/19/u-s-deficit-forecast-masks-true-scope-of-problem/" target="_blank">U.S. deficit forecast masks true scope of problem</a> &#8211; James Pethokoukis, Reuters</li>
<li><a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/38674003" target="_blank">Youth Unemployment Hits Record High</a> &#8211; CNBC</li>
<li><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/july-new-home-sales-fall-to-record-low-pace-2010-08-25" target="_blank">July New-home sales drop to record low 276,000 yearly rate</a> &#8211; Market Watch</li>
<li><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704147804575455270227305744.html" target="_blank">Second Quarter GDP Growth Revised Downward</a> &#8211; Wall Street Journal</li>
<li><a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iadyD5XKmEBG9rKT1EOkoaeIUPwwD9HRMPH01" target="_blank">What Biden didn&#8217;t mention on stimulus</a> &#8211; Associated Press</li>
<li><a href="http://politics.usnews.com/opinion/mzuckerman/articles/2010/08/26/the-most-fiscally-irresponsible-government-in-us-history.html" target="_blank">The Most Fiscally Irresponsible Government in U.S. History</a> &#8211; Mort Zuckerman, U.S. News</li>
<li><a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/08/27/99763/bad-statistics-for-summer-employment.html" target="_blank">Bad statistics for summer employment for youth</a> &#8211; McClatchy</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2010/08/25/cnbc-economy-caught-in-depression-not-recession/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weekly Initial Jobless Claims Rise&#8230; Unexpectedly&#8230; Yet Again&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2010/07/01/weekly-initial-jobless-claims-rise-unexpectedly-yet-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2010/07/01/weekly-initial-jobless-claims-rise-unexpectedly-yet-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 14:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Confidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/?p=3421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is getting silly, it seems like every time new jobless claims rise the media uses words like &#8220;unexpected&#8217; or &#8220;surprising&#8221; to describe the news&#8230; There&#8217;s nothing surprising or unexpected about this week&#8217;s jobless report, not after reports on plunging new home sales in May, and the sharp drop in consumer confidence. Suffices to say [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is getting silly, it seems like every time new jobless claims rise the media uses words like &#8220;unexpected&#8217; or &#8220;surprising&#8221; to describe the news&#8230; There&#8217;s nothing surprising or unexpected about this week&#8217;s jobless report, not after reports on <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/23/AR2010062303997.html" target="_blank">plunging new home sales</a> in May, and the sharp <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-06-29/u-s-economy-confidence-sinks-on-concern-over-jobs.html" target="_blank">drop in consumer confidence</a>.</p>
<p>Suffices to say and up tick in new jobless claims was entirely expected by anyone with half a brain&#8230; <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/jobless-claims-climb-13000-to-472000-2010-07-01" target="_blank">and that&#8217;s exactly we got</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) &#8212; The number of people filing first-time  claims for unemployment benefits climbed 13,000 in the latest week to  472,000, indicating continued weakness in the labor market.</p>
<p>Although claims have fallen 22% from one year ago, they are up 4% since  the start of 2010, according to data from the Labor Department. Weekly  claims typically would have to fall below 400,000 to signify improved  nationwide hiring trends.</p>
<p>Economists surveyed by MarketWatch had expected initial claims to fall  to 455,000. <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/ECONOMY-POLITICS/CALENDARs/economic" target="_blank">See  our complete economic calendar and consensus forecast.</a></p>
<p>The four-week average of initial claims &#8212; a better gauge of employment  trends than the volatile weekly number &#8211; rose by 3,250 to 466,500, the  highest level in almost three months.</p>
<p>While claims tend to align with job growth over the longer term, the  weekly data is prone to sharp fluctuations. A clearer picture of job  growth will emerge Friday when the government releases its monthly  employment report for June.</p></blockquote>
<p>Tomorrow&#8217;s monthly unemployment report should be interesting, economists are reportedly expecting the economy will have added 110,000 jobs in June, excluding the departure of temporary Census workers from government  payrolls. Personally, I&#8217;m kind of pessimistic about about those forecasts, most of today&#8217;s economic news today is discouraging&#8230; Manufacturing <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-07-01/u-s-manufacturing-grows-at-slower-pace-than-forecast-in-ism-s-june-index.html" target="_blank">declined</a> in June, so did <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-07-01/construction-spending-in-u-s-falls-for-first-time-in-3-months.html">construction spending</a>, and <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/pending-home-sales-plunge-30-in-may-2010-07-01" target="_blank">pending home sales</a>. All in all this is look more like a dead cat bounce than a recovery.</p>
<p>Ed&#8217;s got a great chart illustrating just how unexpected today&#8217;s news is over at <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/01/initial-jobless-claims-jump-13000/" target="_blank">Hot Air</a>.</p>
<p>What say you:</p>
Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2010/07/01/weekly-initial-jobless-claims-rise-unexpectedly-yet-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Initial Jobless Claims Rise&#8230; Unexpectedly&#8230; Again</title>
		<link>http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2010/02/25/initial-jobless-claims-rise-unexpectedly-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2010/02/25/initial-jobless-claims-rise-unexpectedly-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 20:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/?p=3239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here we go again, another week and another, um, &#8220;unexpected&#8221; rise in initial jobless claims: The number of new claims for unemployment benefits jumped unexpectedly last week as heavy snows caused layoffs to rise. In addition, many state agencies in the mid-Atlantic and New England regions that process the claims were closed due to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here we go again, another week and another, um, &#8220;unexpected&#8221; <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/02/25/new-jobless-claims-rise-unexpectedly/" target="_blank">rise in initial jobless claims</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The number of new claims for unemployment benefits jumped  unexpectedly last week as heavy snows caused layoffs to rise.</p>
<p>In addition, many state agencies in the mid-Atlantic and New England  regions that process the claims were closed due to the storms and are  now clearing out backlogs, a Labor Department analyst said.</p>
<p>The department said Thursday that first-time claims for unemployment  insurance rose by 22,000 to a seasonally adjusted 496,000. Wall Street  analysts polled by Thomson Reuters expected a drop to 455,000.</p>
<p>Bad weather can cause job losses in construction and other industries  sensitive to weather.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry but I have to ask&#8230; Unexpectedly by whom???</p>
<p><a href="http://jammiewearingfool.blogspot.com/2010/02/stunner-unemployment-claims-jump.html" target="_blank">JWF</a> sums things up nicely:</p>
<blockquote><p>It&#8217;s comical how every story about job losses always calls it <em>unexpected</em>,  with pointy-headed <em>experts</em> baffled by the news. Maybe someone  can ask Professor Obama about  this grim news today during his six-hour lecture to Republicans.</p></blockquote>
<p>Um, yeah, I&#8217;d pay money to see that!</p>
<p>Anyway, it&#8217;s not the weather that&#8217;s driving these new jobless claims it&#8217;s the <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=av4BHgGPQ5Es" target="_blank">slumping consumer confidence and  home prices</a> coupled with the Millions of Americans who are underwater on their mortgages&#8230; roughly 3<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068&amp;sid=aGwcSA_UG5GU" target="_blank">00,000 of them are facing foreclosure</a> each month. Americans simply don&#8217;t have the discretionary capital to invest or consume they they used to. Bottom line we&#8217;re not going to see anything resembling a meaningful recovery until that changes.</p>
<p><strong>Related</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN239866720100223?type=marketsNews" target="_blank">US Jan mass layoffs edge up on weak manufacturing</a> &#8211; Reuters</li>
<li><a href="http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/61720" target="_blank">Read His Lips:  Obama Calls for Increasing Payroll Taxes on ‘Households’ Earning Less  Than $250,000 Per Year</a> &#8211; CNSNews.com</li>
<li><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=ahuuwBS8KYq8&amp;pos=2" target="_blank">Obama May  Prohibit Home-Loan Foreclosures Without HAMP Review</a> &#8211; Bloomberg.com</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2010/02/25/initial-jobless-claims-rise-unexpectedly-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Jobless Claims Rise&#8230; Unexpectedly&#8230; Again&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2010/02/18/new-jobless-claims-rise-unexpectedly-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2010/02/18/new-jobless-claims-rise-unexpectedly-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/?p=3225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here we go again&#8230; another week, another &#8220;unexpected&#8221; rise in new jobless claims: The number of U.S. workers filing new applications for unemployment insurance unexpectedly surged last week, while producer prices increased sharply in January, raising potential hurdles for the economic recovery. Initial claims for state unemployment benefits increased 31,000 to 473,000, the Labor Department [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here we go again&#8230; another week, another &#8220;<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE61F2RH20100218" target="_blank">unexpected</a>&#8221; rise in new jobless claims:</p>
<blockquote><p>The number of  U.S. workers filing new applications for unemployment insurance  unexpectedly surged last week, while producer prices increased sharply  in January, raising potential hurdles for the economic recovery.</p>
<p>Initial claims for state  unemployment benefits increased 31,000 to 473,000, the Labor Department  said on Thursday. That compared to market expectations for 430,000.</p>
<p>Another report from the department showed  prices paid at the farm and factory gate rose a faster than expected 1.4  percent from December after a 0.4 percent gain in December, as higher  gasoline prices and unusually cold temperatures helped boost energy  costs.</p></blockquote>
<p>To be honest I&#8217;m more concerned the sharp rise in producer prices than I am about the increase in new unemployment claims. In short, inflation is starting to rear its ugly head; frankly I think we&#8217;re head for a dead cat bounce rather than a recovery. What say you?</p>
Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.
<p><strong>Related</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703315004575073810416822660.html?mod=WSJ_hps_LEADNewsCollection" target="_blank">Fed Raises Discount Rate Quarter Percentage Point</a> &#8211; Wall Street Journal</li>
<li><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-futures-drift-before-wal-mart-jobless-data-2010-02-18?dist=beforebell" target="_blank">U.S. stock futures fall as economic data disappoints</a> &#8211; MarketWatch.com</li>
<li><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068&amp;sid=aJDE49gj23qo" target="_blank">Jobless Claims  in U.S. Rose Last Week to 473,000</a> &#8211; Bloomberg.com</li>
<li><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068&amp;sid=aZOvpsGZ2iy4" target="_blank">Leading Economic  Index in U.S. Increased 0.3% in January</a> &#8211; Bloomberg.com</li>
<li><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-02-11/obama-agnostic-on-deficit-cuts-won-t-prejudge-tax-increases.html" target="_blank">Obama ‘Agnostic’ on Deficit Cuts, Won’t Prejudge Tax Increases</a> &#8211; Business Week</li>
<li><a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/02/dear_mr_president_why_we_are_n.html" target="_blank">Dear Mr. President: Why We Are Not Hiring</a> &#8211; C.  Edmund Wright, American Thinker</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2010/02/18/new-jobless-claims-rise-unexpectedly-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unemployment Rate Drops to 9.7%</title>
		<link>http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2010/02/06/unemployment-rate-drops-to-9-7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2010/02/06/unemployment-rate-drops-to-9-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 15:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/?p=3202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was going to post this yesterday, but there was something about the numbers that just didn&#8217;t make sense to me so I decided to hold off until I could dig through the report. Anyway, the Associated Press got to use it&#8217;s favorite adverb, &#8220;unexpectedly&#8220;, again today: The job market is lurching toward improvement. It [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to post this yesterday, but there was something about the numbers that just didn&#8217;t make sense to me so I decided to hold off until I could dig through the report.</p>
<p>Anyway, the Associated Press got to use it&#8217;s favorite adverb, &#8220;<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100205/ap_on_bi_go_ec_fi/us_economy" target="_blank">unexpectedly</a>&#8220;, again today:</p>
<blockquote><p>The job market is lurching toward improvement. It just has a long way  to go.</p>
<p>The outlook for jobs became a bit less bleak Friday  when the government released January&#8217;s  unemployment rate showing an unexpected decline from 10 percent  to 9.7 percent. It was the first drop in seven months.</p>
<p>Still, the government now estimates 8.4 million jobs  vanished in the Great Recession. And economists say the nation will be  lucky to get back 1.5 million of them this year. They also warn it will  take until the middle of the decade for the job market to return to  normal.</p>
<p>The economy is growing, and normally job creation  would be strengthening. But the job market is weighed down by employers  who remain slow to hire because consumers are not spending enough.  Companies worry about their prospects once government stimulus aid  fades. They also fret about possibly higher costs related to taxes or health care measures  from Congress and statehouses.</p></blockquote>
<p>Heh, I hate to break this to you folks at the AP, but this wasn&#8217;t unexpected if you&#8217;ve been watching the trends over the last couple of months it was foregone conclusion that the unemployment rate hold steady or decline.</p>
<p>Why? For starters lets take a look at <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t12.htm" target="_blank">Table A-12</a> in the Household Survey, the number of long term unemployed, that is those who have been unemployed for 27 weeks or longer, has been rising steadily for the last several months. For statistical reasons those people are no longer considered part of the workforce.</p>
<p>Second take a look at <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t17.htm#ces_table1.f.p">Table B-1</a> in the Establishment Survey, the total number of jobs in the marketplace has dropped sharply from roughly 133 million in January 2009 to an estimated 129 million in January 2010&#8230; In fact if we look at the historical data the drop is even sharper&#8230; From 137 million in January 2008.</p>
<p>Bottom line the decline in unemployment is the result of statistical manipulation not real job growth. In short if fewer jobs in the marketplace means you&#8217;re naturally going to have a lower percentage of  those unemployed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2010/02/06/unemployment-rate-drops-to-9-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First-time Jobless Claims Rise Unexpectedly&#8230; Again</title>
		<link>http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2010/02/04/first-time-jobless-claims-rise-unexpectedly-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2010/02/04/first-time-jobless-claims-rise-unexpectedly-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 20:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/?p=3199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is getting ridiculous, and as predictable as sunrise&#8230; Just how many times can new jobless claims rise &#8220;unexpectedly&#8221; before the Associated Press realizes there&#8217;s nothing unexpected about it: The number of newly laid-off workers filing initial claims for jobless benefits rose unexpectedly last week, evidence that layoffs are continuing and jobs remain scarce. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is getting ridiculous, and as predictable as sunrise&#8230; Just how many times can new jobless claims rise &#8220;unexpectedly&#8221; before the Associated Press realizes there&#8217;s nothing <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100204/ap_on_bi_go_ec_fi/us_jobless_claims" target="_blank">unexpected</a> about it:</p>
<blockquote><p>The number of newly laid-off workers filing initial claims for jobless benefits rose unexpectedly last  week, evidence that layoffs are continuing and jobs remain scarce.</p>
<p>The rise is the fourth in the past five weeks. Most  economists hoped that claims would resume a downward trend that was  evident in the fall and early winter.</p>
<p>The Labor Department said Thursday that new  claims for unemployment insurance  rose by 8,000 to a seasonally adjusted 480,000. Wall Street economists  had expected a drop to 460,000, according to Thomson Reuters.</p>
<p>The four-week average, which smooths fluctuations,  rose for the third straight week to 468,750.</p>
<p>The figure is the highest in the past two months.  Initial claims dropped sharply in late December, raising hopes among  economists that layoffs were nearing an end and the economy would soon  start generating net gains in jobs.</p></blockquote>
<p>When you couple this report with yesterday’s news that <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/planned-layoffs-rise-for-first-time-since-july-2010-02-03?siteid=rss&amp;rss=1" target="_blank">planned  layoffs have begun increasing</a> again things don&#8217;t bode well for this so called recovery&#8230; Of course if tomorrow’s announcement from the Bureau of Labor Statistics about  unemployment and job creation for January turns out  to be bad news, the media will undoubtedly call it &#8220;unexpected&#8221;.</p>
Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.
<p><strong>Related</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=acv4zpMe6cdU&amp;pos=1" target="_blank">Stocks,  Commodities Plunge, Dollar Gains on Debt, Jobs Concerns</a> &#8211; Bloomberg.com</li>
<li><a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/feb/04/house-vote-19-trillion-more-debt/?feat=home_headlines" target="_blank">House approves $1.9 trillion more debt</a> &#8211; The Washington Times</li>
<li><a href="http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=91343&amp;source=APOnline" target="_blank">Companies boost productivity and put off hiring</a> &#8211; Investors.com</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2010/02/04/first-time-jobless-claims-rise-unexpectedly-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Train Wreck: Retail Sales Fall, Jobless Claims Rise, Foreclosures set Record and the Dollar Crisis</title>
		<link>http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2010/01/14/train-wreck-retail-sales-fall-jobless-claims-rise-foreclosures-set-record-and-the-dollar-crisis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2010/01/14/train-wreck-retail-sales-fall-jobless-claims-rise-foreclosures-set-record-and-the-dollar-crisis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Dollar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/?p=3175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whew, I can&#8217;t believe I got all that in headline! Anyone who has read this blog for any period of time knows I&#8217;m a pessimist on the economy, in short I don&#8217;t see any reason to be hopeful: Retail sales unexpectedly fell in December, leaving 2009 with the biggest yearly drop on record and highlighting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whew, I can&#8217;t believe I got all that in headline!</p>
<p>Anyone who has read this blog for any period of time knows I&#8217;m a pessimist on the economy, in short I don&#8217;t see any reason to be <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Retail-sales-fall-apf-1551827594.html?x=0" target="_blank">hopeful</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Retail sales unexpectedly fell in December, leaving 2009 with the biggest yearly drop on record and highlighting the formidable hurdles facing the economy as it struggles to recover from the deepest recession in seven decades.</p>
<p>In another disappointing economic report, the number of newly laid-off workers requesting unemployment benefits rose more than expected last week as jobs remain scarce.</p>
<p>Still, many economists, puzzled by the retail sales decline that follows reports from retailers of brighter holidays, cautioned that the December figures don&#8217;t necessarily signal a big consumer pullback and could be a blip.</p></blockquote>
<p><!-- Article Related Media -->Right, retail sales fell 0.3 percent in December, overall sales for 2009 fell 6.2 the sharpest decline on government records going back to 1992.</p>
<p>On the jobs front, the Labor Department reports that new claims for unemployment insurance rose by 11,000 to a seasonally adjusted 444,000, sharply higher than the 3,000 new claims forecast by economists.</p>
<p>Add to that a record number of <a href="http://apnews.myway.com/article/20100114/D9D7AN7O0.html" target="_blank">foreclosures</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>A record 2.8 million households were threatened with foreclosure last year, and that number is expected to rise this year as more unemployed and cash-strapped homeowners fall behind on their mortgages.</p>
<p>The number of households that received a foreclosure-related notice rose 21 percent from 2008, RealtyTrac Inc. reported Thursday. One in 45 homes were sent a filing, which includes default notices, scheduled foreclosure auctions and bank repossessions.</p>
<p>In December, more than 349,000 households, or one in 366 homes, were hit with a foreclosure-related notice. That represents a 14 percent spike from November and a 15 percent jump from December 2008.</p>
<p>Banks repossessed more than 92,000 homes, up 19 percent from November. That increase was likely due to lenders working to clear their books at the end of the year, RealtyTrac said.</p></blockquote>
<p>And the looming <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/34848783" target="_blank">dollar crisis</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The United States must soon raise taxes or cut government spending to curb its debt, and failure to act will risk a crippling dollar crisis as investor confidence ebbs, a panel of experts said on Wednesday.</p>
<p>&#8220;It has got to be done. It will be done some day. It may be done with enormous pain. Or it may be done more rationally,&#8221; said Rudolph Penner, a former head of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget office who co-chaired the 24-strong Committee on the Fiscal Future of the United States.</p>
<p>President Barack Obama&#8217;s administration will present his budget for fiscal 2011 early next month amid intense pressure to live up to election campaign promises not to raise taxes on middle class Americans, while confronting a record deficit.</p>
<p>As a result, Obama is expected to focus on long-term fiscal discipline, while maintaining policy support for an economic recovery in the near-term as the country rebuilds after its worst recession since the Great Depression.</p></blockquote>
<p>And you can understand why I&#8217;m pessimistic about the chances for a meaningful economic recovery anytime soon. I&#8217;m sure there&#8217;s reasons for optimism, but I can&#8217;t find them. Everything I seen is pointing towards 1970s style stagnation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2010/01/14/train-wreck-retail-sales-fall-jobless-claims-rise-foreclosures-set-record-and-the-dollar-crisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

