Carrie Prejean Sex Tape

November 10, 2009 by Jeff · Leave a Comment
Filed under: Culture 

I’ve got the video right here:

51InMlaKkrL._SL160_Let’s cut through the bull, Ms. Prejean isn’t the first young woman, Christian or otherwise, who has foolishly sent naughty pictures or video to a boyfriend… and she won’t be the last. Quite honestly I don’t see anything hypocritical about a Christian sinning; one of the principle tenants of the faith is that people are imperfect and will inevitably sin, which is why redemption is needed.

Ms. Prejean’s only ‘crime’ was having the courage to publicly state her deeply held belief that marriage is a union between one man and one woman… and for that the liberal arbiters of Political Correctness have decided that she must be publicly mocked and humiliated. Never mind that her view is the one held by President Barack Obama and many other prominent Americans.

Miss California USA Pageant Co-Director Shanna Moakler Resigns

May 15, 2009 by Jeff · Leave a Comment
Filed under: Culture 

I saw this over at Ace’s place last night and I wasn’t going to say anything about it but there’s something about Ms. Moakler’s self-righteous attitude that sticks in my craw:

The day after Carrie Prejean was told she could keep her Miss California crown, Shanna Moakler has resigned, she confirms to Usmagazine.com exclusively.

“Since the press conference yesterday, I had a chance to think about what has taken place, and I feel that at this time it is in my best interest to resign from the Miss California USA organization,” Moakler tells Usmagazine.com.

“I cannot with a clear conscious [sic] move forward supporting and promoting the Miss Universe Organization when I no longer believe in it, or the contracts I signed committing myself as a youth,” she continues. “I want to be a role model for young women with high hopes of pageantry, but now feel it more important to be a role model for my children. I am sorry and hope I have not let any young supporters down but wish them the best of luck in fulfilling their dreams.”

I’m curious was Ms. Moakler being a role model for young women when she posed for Playboy?

I don’t mean to be snarky but this has nothing do with Carrie Prejean’s work as model and everything to do with Ms. Prejean’s position on gay marriage… You may have missed it in the hype over the so called topless photos of Ms. Prejean but Ms. Moakler has announced she’ll be appearing in a new ad supporting gay rights. She apparently shot a print ad condemning Proposition 8, the initiative that bans gay marriage in California on April 28th.

Carrie Prejean Keeps Her Crown

May 12, 2009 by Jeff · Leave a Comment
Filed under: Culture 

I haven’t felt the need to comment on whole Carrie Prejean “controversy” for various reasons… The whole affair has been has media fueled Charlie Fox Trot. Ms. Prejean has been demonized for expressing the same opinion on Gay Marriage that Pres. Barack Obama has expressed.

The fact that it has taken two weeks for someone to make that very point is indictment of our news media not Ms. Prejean.

Donald Trump, in my opinion made the right decision in this case… Period.

Now about those so called topless photos that surfaced today…

As a photographer I believe Ms. Prejean’s explanation… models are asked to pose for a wide variety of pictures, everything fully clothed to swimwear or lingerie. Many of those can be, for lack of a better word, racy.

The photos released today of Ms. Prejean in a black bikini bottom and an unbuttoned gray sweater vest are in my opinion exactly what Ms. Prejean says they are. The most revealing photos appear to me to be the type of inadvertent “peek-a-boo” shots that often happen during photo shoots involving skimpy clothing. Ms. Prejean does appear to be trying to modestly conceal her “naughty bits” and not intentionally show the world what God gave her.

In my experience shots like that are normally filed with all the other shots taken during that photo session and forgotten about. I for one agree with Ms. Prejean the behavior of the photographer who released those shots was reprehensible and unprofessional.

While he (or she) is most likely within his (or her) legal rights, releasing those photos was in my opinion unethical.

Related