<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Holder Overrules DOJ Ruling Saying D.C. Vote Bill Is Unconstitutional</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2009/04/01/holder-overrules-doj-ruling-saying-dc-vote-bill-is-unconstitutional/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2009/04/01/holder-overrules-doj-ruling-saying-dc-vote-bill-is-unconstitutional/</link>
	<description>Political &#38; Cultural Commentary from a Constitutional Conservative.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:53:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2009/04/01/holder-overrules-doj-ruling-saying-dc-vote-bill-is-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 01:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/?p=1860#comment-537</guid>
		<description>We know the contempt Holder has for the Constitution.
Is it any surprise that he would over rule DOJ lawyers sworn to uphold the Constitution?
One just has to look at the embarassment he was working under  Janet Reno.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We know the contempt Holder has for the Constitution.<br />
Is it any surprise that he would over rule DOJ lawyers sworn to uphold the Constitution?<br />
One just has to look at the embarassment he was working under  Janet Reno.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

