Comments on: So Much for Bipartisanship http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2009/01/05/so-much-for-bipartisanship/ Welcome To My Personal Web Log Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:41:03 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Veretax http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/2009/01/05/so-much-for-bipartisanship/comment-page-1/#comment-388 Veretax Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:30:01 +0000 http://www.jasetaro.com/blog/?p=1314#comment-388 This like the Panetta appointment make sense if you consider. Obama was the most liberal senator in the Senate. That means he values power in Government and if anyone is going to weild power it will be him. Pelosi Changing the rules is just prepping the battlefield.Has anyone considered, that Obama is setting Panetta up as a potential Scape Goat? Seriously, who do you think will be the first to get blamed if another terrorist attack happens? What happened after 9-11? We blamed the intelligence community, so if something happens, Obama will have an easy scape goat in Panetta. That’s why I think he appointed such an unqualified person to the post. It could also be that having such a weak person, would make him as President have more power in the long run. It’s the same way with Pelosi changing the rules in the House. The democrats are setting themselves up either to reap great benefits if things go right, or reap retribution at the ballot box if they utterly fail. This like the Panetta appointment make sense if you consider. Obama was the most liberal senator in the Senate. That means he values power in Government and if anyone is going to weild power it will be him.

Pelosi Changing the rules is just prepping the battlefield.Has anyone considered, that Obama is setting Panetta up as a potential Scape Goat? Seriously, who do you think will be the first to get blamed if another terrorist attack happens?

What happened after 9-11? We blamed the intelligence community, so if something happens, Obama will have an easy scape goat in Panetta. That’s why I think he appointed such an unqualified person to the post.

It could also be that having such a weak person, would make him as President have more power in the long run. It’s the same way with Pelosi changing the rules in the House. The democrats are setting themselves up either to reap great benefits if things go right, or reap retribution at the ballot box if they utterly fail.

]]>